Efficacy assessment of rehabilitation program to patients with duodenum and gastric ulcers by period to recurrent hospitalization

O. M. Ocheredko, N. M. Kizlova

Abstract


400 patients with duodenum and gastric ulcers were traced by cohort design. Experimental rehabilitation program was administered to 220 patients with incident episode of hospitalization followed by 4 years monitoring. 180 patients without program administration constituted control cohort.Response has been measured by period to recurrent hospitalization. Reduction in length of the period bore witness to efficacy of the program. Data were analyzed by frailty semiparametric survival model. Study supports the significant 23 % in average reduction to risk of recurrent hospitalization due to program administration. Rehabilitation program safeguarded 39 additional days to length of recurrent hospitalization.


Keywords


gastric and duodenal ulcer; rehabilitation program; gastroenterological day care department

References


Алебастру А. П. Можливості альтернативної немедикаментозної терапії виразкової хвороби шлунка / А. П. Алебастру, М. А. Бутов // Клінічна медицина. – 2005. – № 1. – С. 32-36.

Передерий В. Г. Как вылечить ХГ, ЯБ и предупредить рак желудка / В. Г. Передерий, В. В. Чернявский. – Луганск: ОАО «ЛОТ», 2005. – 308 с.

Петров В. П. Эффективность консервативного и хирургического лечения больных язвенной болезнью двенадцатиперстной кишки / В. П. Петров, В. В. Осипов // Российский журнал гастроэнтер., гепатолог. и колопрокт. – 2003. – № 5. – С. 14-18.

Наказ МОЗ України від 13.06.2005 р. № 271 Протоколи надання медичної допомоги за спеціальністю: «Гастроентерологія» [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: https://www.moz.gov.ua/ua/portal/dn_20050613_271.html

Ткач С. М. Современные подходы к лечению язвенной болезни / С. М. Ткач, А. П. Николаева // Острые и неотложные состояния в практике врача. – 2008. – № 2/1. – С. 5-7.

Ткач С. М. Современные подходы к лечению язвенной болезни / С. М. Ткач // Терапія. – 2006. – № 4. – С. 56-59.

Aitkin M. The fitting of exponential, Weibull and extreme value distributions to complex censored survival data using GLIM / M. Aitkin, D. Clayton // Applied Statistics – 1980. – № 29. – P. 156-63.

Duchateau L. The Frailty Model / L. Duchateau, P. Janssen. – New York: Springer, 2008. – 543 p.

Orbe J. Alternative approaches to study lifetime data under different scenarios: From the PH to the modified semiparametric AFT model / J. Orbe, V. Nunez-Anton // Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. – 2006. – № 50. – P. 1565–82.

Rosenbaum P. R. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects / P. R. Rosenbaum, D. B. Rubin // Biometrika – 1983. – № 70. – P. 41-55.

Therneau T. M. Penalized survival models and frailty / T. M. Therneau, P. M. Grambsch, V. S. Pankratz // Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. – 2003. – № 12. – P. 156–175.

Wooldridge J. M. Estimating average partial effects under conditional moment independence assumptions / J. M. Wooldridge / The Institute for fiscal studies, Department of economics, ucl cemmap working paper cwp03/04. – London, 2004. – 38 p.


GOST Style Citations


1. Alebastru AP., Butov MA. Possibilities of alternative non-medicine therapy of gastric ulcer. Clinical Medicine. 2005; (1): 32 – 36.

2. Perederiy VG, Chernyavsky VV. How to treat gastric ulcer and prevent gastric cancer. Monograph. Lugansk, OAO LOT. 2005. 308 p.

3. Petrov VP, Osipov VV. The efficacy of conservative and surgical treatment of patients with duodenum ulcer. Russian Journal of gastroenterology. 2003; (5): 14–18.

4. Protocols to administer treatment by specialty: «gastroenterology». Directive of PH Ministry of Ukraine № 271 dated 13.06.2005. 154 p.

5. Tkach SM, Nicolayeva AP. Modern approaches to ulcer disease treatment. First aid and urgent conditions in physician’s practice. 2008; (2/1): 5–7.

6. Tkach SM, Nicolayeva AP. Modern approaches to ulcer disease treatment. Therapy. 2006; (4): 56-59.

7. Aitkin M, Clayton D. The fitting of exponential, Weibull and extreme value distributions to complex censored survival data using GLIM. Applied Statistics. 1980; (29): 156–63.

8. Duchateau L, Janssen P. The Frailty Model. Monofraph. Springer, New York. 2008. 543 p.

9. Orbe J, Nunez-Anton V. Alternative approaches to study lifetime data under different scenarios: From the PH to the modified semiparametric AFT model. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis. 2006; (50): 1565–82.

10. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983; (70); 41-55.

11. Therneau TM, Grambsch PM, Pankratz VS. Penalized survival models and frailty. Journal Statistics. 2003; (12); 156–175.

12. Wooldridge JM. Estimating average partial effects under conditional moment independence assumptions. The Institute for fiscal studies, Department of economics, ucl cemmap working paper cwp03/04. London, 2004; 38 p.





DOI: https://doi.org/10.24959/sphhcj.15.15

Abbreviated key title: Soc. farm. ohor. zdor.

ISSN 2518-1564 (Online), ISSN 2413-6085 (Print)