The methodical approaches to health technology assessment in Ukraine according to the european model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24959/sphhcj.15.18Keywords:
Health Technology Assessment (HTA), HTA Core Model®, pharmaceutical providing, pharmacoeconomic analysis, endometriosisAbstract
The aim of the study was to analyze and present the methodical approaches of health technology assessment(HTA) in Ukraine based on the European experience of HTA Agencies and the opportunities and prospects of adaptation of international data. The methods of HTA have been analyzed and substantiated on the example of treatment of endometriosis in Ukraine. The analysis of the national and international scientific publications, articles, systematic reviews, guidelines on HTA using PubMed,EMBASE and internet resources has been conducted. The HTA methods with the HTA Core Model have been substantiated and tested; directions for the use of the main methodical approaches to HTA taking into account the peculiarities of the national pharmaceutical and medical care have been suggested. As a result of our systematic analysis of the use of the HTA Core Model® by European HTA Agencies the algorithm of the HTA Core model in Ukraine on the national and regional levels according to the European requirements taking into account all the priorities and key trends has been determined. On the example of endometriosis management the method of the HTA Core Model® has been adapted, the alternative treatment regimens have been assessed and the adaptation stages for the assessment of methods and data have been proposed.
References
Воробьев К. П. Европейская политика оценки технологий здравоохранения / К. П. Воробьев // Український медичний часопис. – 2014. – № 2. – С. 142-150.
Воробьев К. П. Национальные агентства оценки технологий здравоохранения в экономически развитых странах / К. П. Воробьев // Український медичний часопис. – 2013. – № 2. – С. 162-172.
Заліська О. М. Історія, стан і перспективи фармакоекономіки в Україні / О. М. Заліська // Еженедельник Аптека. – 2014. – № 15 (936). – Режим доступу до журн.: http://www.apteka.ua/article/286843.
Косяченко К. Л. Методологія оцінки технологій в охороні здоров’я та фармації: актуальність впровадження у вітчизняну систему управління галуззю / К. Л. Косяченко // Управління, економіка та забезпечення якості в фармації. – 2011. – № 5 (19). – С. 24-28.
Мендрік О. А. Перспективи розширення застосування оцінки технологій охорони здоров’я (Health technology assessment) / О. А. Мендрік, О. Заглада // Україна. Здоров’я нації. – 2010. – № 2. – С. 128-131.
Немченко А. С. Дослідження міжнародного досвіду впровадження оцінки технологій в охороні здоров’я / А. С. Немченко, К. Л. Косяченко // Фармацевтичний журнал. – 2011. – № 5. – С. 50-54.
Піняжко О. Б. Теоретичні основи і напрями використання мультикритеріального аналізу рішень у фармацевтичній галузі України відповідно до європейського вектора реформування / О. Б. Піняжко, О. М. Заліська // Фармацевтичний часопис. – 2015. – № 2 (34). – С. 119-124.
Піняжко О. Б. Аналіз фармацевтичного забезпечення при гінекологічних захворюваннях в Україні та світі / О. Б. Піняжко, О. М. Заліська, Н. Р. Готь, Л. І. Гнатишак // Фармацевтичний часопис. – 2013. – № 4 (29). – С. 109-115.
Briggs A. Decision modelling for health economic evaluation / A. Briggs, K. Claxton, M. Schulpher. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)-explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force / D. Husereau, M. Drummond, S. Petrou et al. // CHEERS Task Force.Value Health. – 2013. – № 16 (2). – Р. 231-250.
EUnetHTA Joint Action 2, Work Package 8. HTA Core Model ® version 2.1 (Pdf); 2015. Available from http://www.corehta.info/BrowseModel.aspx.
Guegan E. EUnetHTA: further steps towards European cooperation on health technology assessment / E. Guegan, M. Huić, C. Teljeur // International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. – 2014. – № 30. – Р. 475-477.
Jones G. Development of the Short Form Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire: the EHP-5 // G. Jones, C. Jenkinson, S. Kennedy // Qual Life Res. – 2004. – № 13 (3). – P. 695-704.
Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions / M. Drummond, J. Schwartz, B. Jonsson et al. // International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. – 2008. – № 24. – Р. 244-258.
Kolasa K. Role of health technology assessment in the process of implementation of the EU Transparency Directive: relevant experience from Central Eastern European countries / K. Kolasa, Z. Kalo, V. Zah, T. Dolezal // Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. – 2012. – Vol. 12. – P. 283-287.
Kosyachenko K. L. Methodological approaches to development of the national guidelines on the health technology assessment / K. L. Kosyachenko, A. S. Nemchenko // Вісник фармації. – 2014. – № 1. – С. 54-57.
Methods for systematic reviews of health economic evaluations: a systematic review, comparison, and synthesis of method literature / T. Mathes, M. Walgenbach, S. L. Antoine et al. // Med Decis Making. – 2014. – № 34 (7). – P. 826-840.
Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programme / M. F. Drummond, M. J. Sculpher, G. W. Torrance et al. – Third edition. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Mettler L. Impact of medical and surgical treatment of endometriosis on the cure of endometriosis and pain / L. Mettler, R. Ruprai, I. Alkatout // Biomed Res Int. – 2014. – Vol. 2014.
Support in Market Development, SMD – P. [Electronic resourse] Access mode: http://www.smd.net.ua/.
The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres / S. Simoens, G. Dunselman, C. Dirksen et al. // Hum. Reprod. – 2012. – Vol. 27 (5). – Р. 1292-1301.
The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. – P. [Electronic resourse] Access mode: http://handbook.cochrane.org/
The HTA Core Model: A novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments / K. Lampe, M. Makela, M. Velasco Garrido et al. // International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. – 2009. – Vol. 25. – P. 9-20.
Transferability of economic evaluations across jurisdictions: ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report / M. Drummond, M. Barbieri, J. Cook et al. // Value Health. – 2009. – Vol. 12. – P. 409-418.
Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the use of existing instruments and their modification PRO Task Force Report / M. Rothman, L. Burke, P. Erickson et al. // Value in Health. – 2009. – Vol. 12. – P. 1075-83.
Velasco Garrido M. Developing Health Technology Assessment to Address Health Care System Needs / M. Velasco Garrido, A. Gerhardus, J. A. Rоttingen, R. Busse // Health Policy. – 2010. – Vol. 94. – P. 196-202.
World bank. – P. [Electronic resourse] Access mode: http://data.worldbank.org/country/ukraine
Zalis’ka O. The prevalence and cost of illness in women with endometriosis in Ukraine/ O. Zalis’ka, O. Piniazhko, I. Vernikovskyy, L. Gnatyshak // Value in Health. – 2014. – Abstracts 17th ISPOR Annual European Congress 8-12 November, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. – Vol. 17, № 7. – P. 158.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 National University of Pharmacy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
